Issue No. 27 · OCTOBER 2026 · An arsenal for the stateless society
Free
Market
Wins.
An arsenal for the stateless society
Every claim for aggression, followed to its conclusion. Every central plan, priced out.
Read the essays
The Anarcho-Capitalist Checkmate
The NAP, proven by elimination.
Scarce means, unlimited wants: conflict is guaranteed. There are only three ways to handle it, and two of them collapse into one group's whims overriding reality. What's left standing is non-aggression.
Every argument against ancap, ranked.
Democracy isn't freedom. It is your favoured choice of oppression.
The whole case,
in three moves.
The vault's spine. Everything else on the site is this argument applied to something specific.
Conflict is unavoidable.
Scarce means, infinite wants. Crusoe wants the stick for fishing; Friday wants it for the fire. Even Eden has conflict: two people can't stand in the same spot.
There are only three laws.
Never avoid conflict (Jungle Law). Avoid it sometimes (Mixed Law). Avoid it, full stop (the NAP). The first two reduce to the Primacy of Consciousness: someone's whim overriding reality.
Arguing against it proves it.
Argument is conflict-free by nature. To argue for aggression is to presuppose non-aggression: a performative contradiction. ~A stands.
Read Argumentation EthicsThe full map
Interactive · drag, zoom, open any note
What this vault does
In this issue.
This vault entails the following:
- A complete dismantlement of any pro-aggression law ethic (democratism/Marxism/consequentialism/etc)
the logical justification of the NAP 🌟 - Showing that even if we take these failed ethics seriously they all objectively fail economically
* laughs in ECP (economic calculation problem) * 🤣 - Berate all centrally planned, ‘moral outrage’, altruistic, bullshit economic policies that are promoted by these failed ethics
bbut… muh healthcare! muh roads! muh social safety net! 🤡 - How the free market wins!
The reigning, defending, undefeated, undisputed, heavyweight champion of the world, Capitalism!! 👑