Free Market Wins
Start here
Core Theory

3 min read

Regulatory Capture

Regulatory capture is what happens when the industry a regulator was set up to police ends up running the regulator. It isn’t a malfunction of regulation. It’s what regulation is for, from the point of view of everyone with a stake in it.

The modern statement is George Stigler’s “The Theory of Economic Regulation” (1971): as a rule, regulation is acquired by the industry and is designed and operated primarily for its benefit. Cronyism is the same thing seen from the other side — firms getting rich by obtaining favours from the state instead of by serving customers.

Why It Always Happens

Look at who cares about a rule. A licensing law for, say, electricians is worth millions to the existing electricians — it keeps competitors out. To each customer, it costs a few dollars on a bill they’ll never trace back to the law. The incumbents have every reason to lobby, fund, staff and pressure the regulator. The customers have no reason to even know it exists.

So the regulator hears from one side only. Its staff come from the industry and go back to it. Its rules are written with the industry’s expertise. Its “standards” are whatever the largest firms can already meet and their smaller rivals can’t. Concentrated benefits, dispersed costs: politicians and agencies respond to whoever is organised, and the organised party is always the incumbent (see Democracy).

None of this needs corruption. It follows from incentives alone — the Inverse incentive structure of an institution that faces no profit-and-loss test and can’t lose its customers.

Market Power vs Political Power

Two kinds of power get confused under words like “oligarchy” and “Big Tech”:

  • Market power is the power to refuse to sell to you on your terms. You can still go elsewhere, make it yourself, or do without. A firm keeps it only by continuing to serve customers better than the alternatives.
  • Political power is the power to make you pay regardless — through a tax, a mandate, a licence that bans your alternative, a subsidy taken from you and given to them.

Only the second is a grievance. Every lasting monopoly in history was built or protected by the second: state franchises for utilities, licences for taxis, charters for banks, patents for inventions. The fix for capture is never a bigger regulator, because a bigger regulator is a bigger prize. The fix is removing the prize.

The Pattern to Watch For

The standard sequence:

  1. A real grievance, caused by a state privilege (a franchised monopoly, a subsidy, a licence, a permit).
  2. The grievance is blamed on “the market” or “greed”.
  3. The proposed remedy is more regulation.
  4. The regulation is captured by the same firms, which now have a higher wall around them.

That’s the arsonist offering to run the fire brigade. The answer is to name the privilege at step 1 and remove it.

And decentralisation helps. Fifty competing jurisdictions are fifty smaller prizes, and firms and people can leave the bad ones. One central rulebook is one prize, captured once, with nowhere to go.

See also: State, Central planning, Mixed Law, Inverse incentive structure, Democracy, Skin in the game